Re: PL-300 topic 2 question 21
Agreed
Get up-to-date https://www.pinterest.com/pin/937522847419269938/
IT Certification exam information exchange, brain dumps discussions sharing.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Share Test → Microsoft Certifications → PL-300 topic 2 question 21
Agreed
Get up-to-date https://www.pinterest.com/pin/937522847419269938/
The answer provided is wrong I think, because - can a star schema hace 2 fact tables? no r8
Apologies, just learned that there could be star schema with multiple fact tables
Teacher Dimension (Teacher Name)
Attendance Fact (Period Number)
Teacher Name cannot be in Teacher Fact. Fact is a Transaction Table. Transaction tables cannot have the name of the teacher.
poor structured question...I also agree it should be dimension table for both
The structure of the question make no sense indeed. The way I see it is that each view produces a fact table because non of them meets the requirement for the dimension table. Hence we have two fact tables that can be connected to each other and we don't have any dim tables. How is that supposed to make a star schema??
Teacher Dim -- attribute just like employee dim
Attendance fact --- what we are aggregating is related to attendance, just like transactions, count of ...etc.
Can someone help me understand this question
Share Test → Microsoft Certifications → PL-300 topic 2 question 21
Note: This forum is a platform for users to share insights and discuss exam-related topics. We do not provide authentic exam questions or answers. The content here is contributed by community members and is meant for collaborative learning and discussion purposes only. Users are encouraged to refer to official sources for accurate exam materials.